<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.0//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query/static/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet><Article><Journal><PublisherName>Librello</PublisherName><JournalTitle>Politics and Governance</JournalTitle><Issn></Issn><Volume>1</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2013</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>05</Day></PubDate></Journal><ArticleTitle>Breaking Empirical Deadlocks in the Study of Partisanship: An Overview of Experimental Research Strategies</ArticleTitle><FirstPage>6</FirstPage><LastPage>15</LastPage><ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.12924/pag2013.01010006</ELocationID><Language>EN</Language><AuthorList><Author><FirstName>Donald</FirstName><MiddleName>P.</MiddleName><LastName>Green</LastName><Affiliation>Department of Political Science, Columbia University, USA. dpg2110@columbia.edu</Affiliation></Author></AuthorList><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">PaG-1.1.6</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>19</Day></PubDate><PubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></PubDate><PubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>09</Day></PubDate></History><Abstract>The vast literature on party identification has gradually become bogged down by disputes about how to interpret observational data. This paper proposes the use of experimental research designs to shed light on the responsiveness of party identification to short term forces such as retrospective performance evaluations. Examples of recent field experiments are used to illustrate two types of experimental designs and the assumptions on which they rest.</Abstract></Article></ArticleSet>
